<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: weapon of choice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://noisyheads.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/weapon-of-choice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://noisyheads.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/weapon-of-choice/</link>
	<description>noisyheads begins here...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 01:53:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Naseem</title>
		<link>http://noisyheads.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/weapon-of-choice/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Naseem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisyheads.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-36</guid>
		<description>I used seam in my last project, I belive it is best framework available rightnow.It give you a cleaner programing model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used seam in my last project, I belive it is best framework available rightnow.It give you a cleaner programing model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noisyheads</title>
		<link>http://noisyheads.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/weapon-of-choice/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>noisyheads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisyheads.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-6</guid>
		<description>At the moment, I&#039;m pretty comfortable with Intellij+Grails. Might be too late for me to make the switch just in case. But Groovy support in Seam is really cool. Hopefully tool support could catch up. I would take a look at it again some other time. Thanx!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the moment, I&#8217;m pretty comfortable with Intellij+Grails. Might be too late for me to make the switch just in case. But Groovy support in Seam is really cool. Hopefully tool support could catch up. I would take a look at it again some other time. Thanx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Orshalick</title>
		<link>http://noisyheads.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/weapon-of-choice/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Orshalick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisyheads.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-4</guid>
		<description>You could also take a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://solutionsfit.com/blog/2008/04/01/getting-groovy-with-seam-after-tssjs/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Groovy with Seam&lt;/a&gt;.  This approach provides you the advantages of a dynamic language, while still enabling the solid foundation Seam provides.  The big drawback at the moment is the Eclipse plugin (see the comments on the posting).  Since JBoss Tools is Eclipse-based, this can be a potential pain-point.  Certainly let us know what you think!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could also take a look at <a href="http://solutionsfit.com/blog/2008/04/01/getting-groovy-with-seam-after-tssjs/" rel="nofollow">Groovy with Seam</a>.  This approach provides you the advantages of a dynamic language, while still enabling the solid foundation Seam provides.  The big drawback at the moment is the Eclipse plugin (see the comments on the posting).  Since JBoss Tools is Eclipse-based, this can be a potential pain-point.  Certainly let us know what you think!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noisyheads</title>
		<link>http://noisyheads.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/weapon-of-choice/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>noisyheads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisyheads.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Isn&#039;t Wicket more in the company of Struts, JSF, and other frontend frameworks? What I need right now is a full stack. Thanx for the note. I&#039;ll check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Isn&#8217;t Wicket more in the company of Struts, JSF, and other frontend frameworks? What I need right now is a full stack. Thanx for the note. I&#8217;ll check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://noisyheads.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/weapon-of-choice/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisyheads.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Why not give Wicket a try? Leverages your JAVA skills, and the learning curve is not that steep..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not give Wicket a try? Leverages your JAVA skills, and the learning curve is not that steep..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
